The following are my observations on the emergent church. As such, some of my observations may not apply to every group with the total community that calls itself the emergent church. The danger is that the thinking and ideas by some individuals within the movement will eventually influence the thinking and direction of the whole movement. It needs to be said that this not meant to be an exhaustive study of the whole movement but simply my personal observations.
I see the emergent church being shaped by culture in the way it worships and the way it defines its beliefs. Its participants are molding the church to its own preference. A proper view of scripture is that scripture is to mold culture to its propositional truth. The Bible is not to be viewed through the eyes of culture, but culture is to be viewed through the eyes of scripture. The former provides a subjective view while the latter is objective. The former is a type of relativism while the latter gives us an unchanging standard for faith and practice.
The emergent church rises out of what they call the failure of the institutional church to effect change. The church’s job is to give the world what it needs, not what it wants. True failure is refusing to speak the truth in love. The scriptures never define success in terms of numbers but in terms of faithfulness. [Matthew 25:21; 1 Corinthians 4:2; 3:7] Faithfulness is defined by three propositions. One, did I do my best? Two, did I finish the task given to me? Three, did I do it God’s way? The emergent church thinks in terms of of having a better idea or our way is better than God’s way.
The emergent church says we cannot know absolute truth, or, at least, that we cannot know absolutely. The Bible clearly defines absolute truth as an attribute of the Godhead and everything God has said in His inspired Word. The inability to know absolute truth will opens the door to universalism and the denial of Jesus Christ as “the way, the truth and the life.” And His exclusive claim that “no man cometh to the Father but by me.” [John 14:6]
For the emergent church the inability to know absolute truth creates a problem of being able to identify who is a true believers and who is a non-believer. It impacts what they would consider evangelism. Within the emergent church there is a growing emphasis upon the social gospel at the expense of the proclamation of propositional truth. This coupled with the tendency not to assert that Christianity is true and authoritative makes the emergent church a movement leaning toward the ecumenism of the World Council of Churches and Romanism.
The emergent church focuses more on orthopraxy that orthodoxy. It forgets, or at least diminishes the idea, that what one believes determines how one lives. Without an orthodox belief system, how does the emergent church know what is proper orthopraxy? It was Solomon who said, “for as he thinketh in his heart, so is he…” [Proverbs 23:7] What will control the thought process? It will either be the Word of God [orthodoxy] or the ever changing culture in which he lives.
Another danger for the emergent church is the casualness of their worship style. For some sitting on couches and drinking coffee and conversing with one another. The fear of God is missing. All through scripture we see that when men who worship God recognize they are in the presence of holy God, it changes the way they worship. They understand they are on “holy ground” and it is reflected by their reverence. This problem is not limited to the emergent church. Much of what we call worship today reflects casualness and a lack of reverence for God.
Another aspect of the emergent church is the focus on a person’s story rather than on propositional truth. Propositional truth is not totally rejected but it is a very low priority Truth is a person’s story rather than the truth being defined by God. This generates subjectivism, relativism and man centeredness rather than a God centered focus and the objectivity brought about by the Word of God.
These are my thoughts and I welcome your comments. Use the little envelope below to send me you comments both pro and con.
I see the emergent church being shaped by culture in the way it worships and the way it defines its beliefs. Its participants are molding the church to its own preference. A proper view of scripture is that scripture is to mold culture to its propositional truth. The Bible is not to be viewed through the eyes of culture, but culture is to be viewed through the eyes of scripture. The former provides a subjective view while the latter is objective. The former is a type of relativism while the latter gives us an unchanging standard for faith and practice.
The emergent church rises out of what they call the failure of the institutional church to effect change. The church’s job is to give the world what it needs, not what it wants. True failure is refusing to speak the truth in love. The scriptures never define success in terms of numbers but in terms of faithfulness. [Matthew 25:21; 1 Corinthians 4:2; 3:7] Faithfulness is defined by three propositions. One, did I do my best? Two, did I finish the task given to me? Three, did I do it God’s way? The emergent church thinks in terms of of having a better idea or our way is better than God’s way.
The emergent church says we cannot know absolute truth, or, at least, that we cannot know absolutely. The Bible clearly defines absolute truth as an attribute of the Godhead and everything God has said in His inspired Word. The inability to know absolute truth will opens the door to universalism and the denial of Jesus Christ as “the way, the truth and the life.” And His exclusive claim that “no man cometh to the Father but by me.” [John 14:6]
For the emergent church the inability to know absolute truth creates a problem of being able to identify who is a true believers and who is a non-believer. It impacts what they would consider evangelism. Within the emergent church there is a growing emphasis upon the social gospel at the expense of the proclamation of propositional truth. This coupled with the tendency not to assert that Christianity is true and authoritative makes the emergent church a movement leaning toward the ecumenism of the World Council of Churches and Romanism.
The emergent church focuses more on orthopraxy that orthodoxy. It forgets, or at least diminishes the idea, that what one believes determines how one lives. Without an orthodox belief system, how does the emergent church know what is proper orthopraxy? It was Solomon who said, “for as he thinketh in his heart, so is he…” [Proverbs 23:7] What will control the thought process? It will either be the Word of God [orthodoxy] or the ever changing culture in which he lives.
Another danger for the emergent church is the casualness of their worship style. For some sitting on couches and drinking coffee and conversing with one another. The fear of God is missing. All through scripture we see that when men who worship God recognize they are in the presence of holy God, it changes the way they worship. They understand they are on “holy ground” and it is reflected by their reverence. This problem is not limited to the emergent church. Much of what we call worship today reflects casualness and a lack of reverence for God.
Another aspect of the emergent church is the focus on a person’s story rather than on propositional truth. Propositional truth is not totally rejected but it is a very low priority Truth is a person’s story rather than the truth being defined by God. This generates subjectivism, relativism and man centeredness rather than a God centered focus and the objectivity brought about by the Word of God.
These are my thoughts and I welcome your comments. Use the little envelope below to send me you comments both pro and con.